Latest Compatibility List
Posted 14 August 2013 - 08:34 AM
It's possible that invisable(at least to average user) conflict occurs while apparently there's no problem.
However, Immunet's official compatible application list is now too old and doesn't make sense any more. It's for Immunet 2.0 and 2009 or 2010 version of other AV.
I would very appriciate if Immunet publishes latest compatibility list.
And also, if they can add option to the level of heuristics(i.e. OFF/LOW/HIGH), it would be good IMHO.
- Hapewsleppucel likes this
Posted 14 August 2013 - 03:28 PM
Your suggestions have been noted, and have been passed along to the relevant people (i.e., developers)
Even though we have not been able to explicitly test compatibility with other AVs recently, we have not received very many (if at all) cases of incompatibility issues due to other AV software (as long as exclusions are added between each other).
Is there any reason why are you interested in asking for heuristics options? (I also saw your other thread: I expect it to be related to the False Positive?)
Thank you for your feedback.
Posted 15 August 2013 - 02:07 PM
I know that, and it's also true to other complemental/companion AVs.
But I think Immunet have tested compatibility in there test environment, doesn't it?
I found a document impliying above (or something like that) when I firstly got Immunet Free.
This is great cuz as I mentioned, there can be invisible compatibility problem, like avast + comodo FW, which is known as golden combination however they have(had? I don't know exactly) a problem related avast's proxy.
Zemana also have public compatibility list, but it's an anti-logger and only paid version has realtime protection.
>I also saw your other thread: I expect it to be related to the False Positive?
Actually not, I just want to maximize immunet protection unless they produce a large amount of warnings (well, but if I could turn off heuristics, possibly I can avoid FPs without turning off protection). So far, Immenet rerely makes FPs on my use except that one, that's good!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users