I'm sorry, but I find the survey very disturbing. I cannot get the Immunet 7 service to stay running and development wants to ask how I feel about the importance of "history" and if I like the idea of moving history to the Windows Event Viewer. Are they serious? The location of "history" is the biggest thing they are worried about? How about they fix what they have before they rip away or add new features? How about leaning on your support forum for actual customer feedback?
BTW, Windows Event Viewer interface is old and outdated. Why Microsoft has not changed the MMC interface is beyond me. I have to resort to LDAP queries and other scripts to properly search/filter event viewer at work and now Immunet wants to know if I'm ok with that on my home computer? No thank you.
I would rather see some Cisco AMP for Endpoint features making their way into Immunet. I would like to know what my family members were doing on a computer when an incident occurs. AMP makes this very nice. This is a step forward. Windows Event Viewer is a step backwards.
If Cisco is not willing to resolve the issues with Immunet and properly support the consumer base, then pull the plug and let it die. I really hope Immunet development continues and improves.