Jump to content

markusg

Immunet Insiders
  • Content Count

    82
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

markusg last won the day on May 13 2015

markusg had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About markusg

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. haha tr.dropper is no malware :d i can send you eenough links with tr.dropper.gen malware samples...
  2. markusg

    Virus Total Project

    hi. i think more vendors as listed at vt getting malware. so this means, immunet is not listed in the scan results, but i think they get malware from vt.
  3. this looks like an detection in system volume. try to de-and reactivate it.
  4. also, no problems. and if there are some, i have an image :-)
  5. but you can set special groups and only this groups are able to download, like at mbam forum.
  6. so immunet used the ask toolbar, should all vendors do not like ask blacklist immunet? i do not think immunit will block iobit.
  7. i think they have learn and are not stealing signatures, this is 1 year ago and i do not think its an good idea to blog this.
  8. have a look at statistiks, firefox is more unsafe as internet explorer. ff has 50 securitiy holes in the last 3 months. opera is more safe as firefox and also ie is more safe i personaly use my browser in sandboxie. for updates you can use file hippo. because its not only important to keep windows and java up to date, also adobe and all other applications. http://www.filehippo.com/updatechecker/ right klick the tray symbol, select, settings, results, hide beta updates.
  9. markusg

    New User

    hi, you can not take the vt results and say, a file is malware or not, i have often malware here and the vt results shows 0/43... @Pete is it posible to attach the file, so we can check it.
  10. you can hide all kind of malware in installern, i saw often, tdss icomes with an keygen, so you have packed the real keygen + tdss dropper :-)
  11. i haven't said its an bad result please do not get me wrong. but i think the largest detection parts make the bitdefender engine, so you need perhaps more own technologies, and i know you are developing. it was only 1 point i want to say
  12. i see 1 problem... bitdefender single 99,3 imunet 99.4 this shows imunit it self has to do some work. but conrats, 99.4 is truly a good resoult at all.
  13. ok, you say, large vendors spend time in crawling this sites because of reviews and want to sale. but i think you also want to sale your produkt, so i think you must also watch some public websites, you can create automatic tools and they can download the stuff for you, or perhaps you can also get in contakt with site owners and they send you the stuff. its ok for me to say, you want not to spend to much time in such lists at this moment, but when you can get this malware so easy you have to take it i think. i also think vendors sharing samples to, perhaps get in contakt with other vendors perhaps this is usefull. i also think you need perhaps honeypots and so on, all what helps to detect malware before an user is infected. and you need good heuristics, this is true :-)
  14. ok but the other results are looking good
×
×
  • Create New...