degarb Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 I, alongside many well researched and security minded folk here, use Bufferzone pro. If I had to choose between av and BZ, bz would win. However, I shouldn't need to make that choice. But, I think there may be compatibility issues between the two, since much of the install is in docs and settings, which I delete monthly anyway volutarily or other wise. Also, there may be background upgrading and storage into this area, meaning BZ will put into this virtual, disposable area, and confusing area, rather than into the immunet directory. don't care what they are teaching you. Never design a program that puts settings and install into a disposable area. Backing up into this area is okay, but don't rely on the registry or docs and setting to be present on next boot! ---experienced PC user. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweidre Posted May 2, 2011 Report Share Posted May 2, 2011 I, alongside many well researched and security minded folk here, use Bufferzone pro. Hi degarb, I remember, that I have tested Bufferzone once, with its "red" border. But I uninstalled it, because I had both Sandboxie Free & above all Returnil Safe Free. I trust Returnil, when working in its virtual layer above my systemdisk! (Sandboxie I am not using, in fact). I have just checked Bufferzone at CNET, and I found one user review there, writing that Bufferzone does not work properly for Windows 7 64-bit. So, I will not try it again! Cheers, sweidre Win 7 Pro 64-bit & Immunet Free (cloud-based only) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.